It is a widely believed myth that the US Government is not allowed to perform research on “gun violence.” This is stated over and over by anti-gun politicians and anti-gun advocates. These advocates talk about how “The NRA has blocked gun violence research for 20 years. Let’s end its stranglehold on science.” How they are able to make these claims is beyond me.

The real law about gun studies

“None of the funds made available for injury prevention and control at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention may be used to advocate or promote gun control.” – Omnibus Consolidated Appropriations Act of 1997

Nowhere in that does it say the CDC cannot study firearms. Nowhere does it say the CDC cannot study gun deaths. Nowhere does it say the CDC cannot study gun violence. Nowhere does it say the CDC cannot study violent crime.

The law states the CDC cannot “advocate or promote gun control.” To me, that makes sense. The government cannot advocate or promote something that infringes on a constitutional right. If there was a law that says the CDC cannot “advocate or promote the restriction of free speech” no one would bat an eye. But the anti-gun movement has taken this law and used it to say something completely wrong.

That section of the Omnibus Consolidated Appropriations Act of 1997 was put into place because of the following statement from 1989 by the Acting Section Head of Division of Injury Control of the CDC.

“We’re going to systematically build a case that owning firearms causes deaths. We’re doing the most we can do, given the political realities.” – P.W. O’Carroll, Acting Section Head of Division of Injury Control, CDC (source)

And in 1917 the leadership within the CDC had an objective:

“The objective has broadened so that it now includes banning and confiscation of all handguns, restrictive licensing of owners of other firearms, and eventual elimination of firearms from American life, excepting (perhaps) only a small elite of extremely wealthy collectors, hunters, or target shooters.” (source)

To put it bluntly, entities within the CDC had stated they want to remove firearms from American life, except for the “small elite.” Firearms in the hands of the elite is the exact opposite of how America was founded.

That is why Congress, not the NRA, blocked the CDC from promoting “gun control” – which did not ban the CDC from studying “gun violence.”

The NRA’s actual stance on firearms studies

Let’s be clear, the National Rifle Association is not opposed to research that would encourage the safe and responsible use of firearms and reduce the numbers of firearm-related deaths.” – Chris Cox, executive director of the National Rifle Association Institute for Legislative Action (source)

Examples of US Government gun studies

To further dispel the myth that the government is blocked from studying firearms deaths, let’s look at some actual studies from the US Government about firearms. There are quite a few over the years.

CDC firearms related studies

FBI firearms related studies

DOJ firearms related studies

Congressional Research firearms related study

Bureau of Justice Statistics firearms related studies

List of the BJS Studies

  • Background Checks for Firearm Transfers, 2013-2014
  • Background Checks for Firearm Transfers, 2012
  • Firearm Violence, 1993-2011
  • Background Checks for Firearm Transfers, 2010
  • Firearms Stolen during Household Burglaries and Other Property Crimes, 2005-2010
  • Background Checks for Firearm Transfers, 2009
  • National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS)
  • Federal Firearms Cases, FY 2008
  • Background Checks for Firearm Transfers, 2008
  • Background Checks for Firearm Transfers, 2007
  • Background Checks for Firearm Transfers, 2006
  • Background Checks for Firearm Transfers, 2005
  • Survey of State Procedures Related to Firearm Sales, 2005
  • Federal Law Enforcement Officers, 2004
  • Background Checks for Firearm Transfers, 2004
  • Survey of State Procedures Related to Firearm Sales, Midyear 2004
  • Background Checks for Firearm Transfers, 2003: Trends for the Permanent Brady Period, 1999-2003
  • Survey of State Procedures Related to Firearm Sales, Midyear 2003
  • Background Checks for Firearm Transfers, 2002
  • Weapon Use and Violent Crime, 1993-2001
  • Federal Law Enforcement Officers, 2002
  • Improving Criminal History Records for Background Checks: National Criminal History Improvement Program (NCHIP)
  • Survey of State Procedures Related to Firearm Sales, Midyear 2002
  • Survey of State Procedures Related to Firearm Sales, Midyear 2001
  • Firearm Use by Offenders
  • Federal Law Enforcement Officers, 2000
  • Survey of State Procedures Related to Firearm Sales, Midyear 2000
  • Firearm Injury and Death from Crime, 1993-97
  • Survey of State Procedures Related to Firearm Sales, Midyear 1999
  • Presale Handgun Checks, the Brady Interim Period, 1994-98
  • Carjackings in the United States, 1992-96
  • Survey of State Procedures Related to Firearm Sales, 1997
  • Presale Handgun Checks, 1997
  • Firearm-related Statutes, 1996: Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, and South Dakota
  • Federal Law Enforcement Officers, 1996
  • Survey of State Procedures Related to Firearm Sales, 1996
  • Presale Firearm Checks
  • Domestic Violence in Florida, 1994 and 1995
  • Weapons Offenses and Offenders–Firearms, Crime, and Criminal Justice: Selected Findings
  • Guns Used in Crime: Firearms, Crime, and Criminal Justice
  • Federal Firearms-Related Offenses: Federal Offenses and Offenders
  • Survey of Criminal History Information Systems, 1993, with Supplementary Information on Presale Firearms Checks, 1994
  • Survey of Criminal History Information Systems, 1993, With Supplementary Information on Presale Firearm Checks, 1994
  • Firearms and Crimes of Violence: Selected Findings From National Statistical Series
  • Violent Crime in the United States
  • Toy Guns: Involvement in Crime and Encounters with Police
  • Identifying Persons, Other Than Felons, Ineligible to Purchase Firearms: A Feasibility Study

That isn’t even a comprehensive list of all of the government studies on firearms and firearms related topics.

I don’t know about you, but that’s a lot of studies and statistics about firearms directly from the US Government.

The US government can (and does) research firearms

There is a plethora of studies about firearms, “gun violence,” firearm related deaths, and similar topics provided to us from the US Government. Why haven’t these government backed gun studies been mentioned by the anti-gun movement even though they beg for government backed gun studies?

I’m going to guess they don’t like the results of these studies, so they ignore them.